Notes for AKT-170317/0:10:47: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups. To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebr...")
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups.
Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups.
To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra to a Lie group, call it G_0.
To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra $g_0$ to a Lie group, call it $G_0$. In $GL_3$ it is the group
of upper triangular matrices with ones on the top left and bottom right.
I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but g_0 is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra.
I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but $g_0$ is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra.
Translating this to G_0 makes G_0 a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions
F(G_0). Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H:G_0 -> R$ is enough to write the equations of motion
(it has a compatible bracket on the dual the trivial one in the case of $g_0$).
Translating this to $G_0$ makes $G_0$ a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions
on G_0. They are df/dt = {f,H}
$F(G_0)$. Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H\in F(G_0)$ is enough to write the equations of motion
on $G_0$. They are $df/dt = \{f,H\}$

With all this in place we can first remark the fact that our r-matrix is closely related to the bialgebra structure and CYBE
It's easier to pass to the Lie-group G_0 that corresponds to
to be a condition for integrability of the classical mechanical system.

Next we may quantize with respect to the Poisson structure to obtain a deformation of the algebra of functions $F_h(G_0)$.
We would then like to think of this non-commutative algebra as the algebra of functions on the (non-existent) quantum group.
Integrability survives the quantization and is now expressed in terms of the R-matrix satisfying Yang-Baxter.
Dually one may also consider universal enveloping algebra and its deformation as a Hopf algebra.


Quantizing often seems a little ad-hoc but Kontsevich gave a general procedure for (deformation) quantizing with respect to
any Poisson structure. [http://www.ihes.fr/~maxim/TEXTS/DefQuant_final.pdf]


A reference for such things would be A guide to quantum groups by Chari and Pressley.
{{Roland}}
{{Roland}}

Latest revision as of 15:17, 21 March 2017

Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups. To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra $g_0$ to a Lie group, call it $G_0$. In $GL_3$ it is the group of upper triangular matrices with ones on the top left and bottom right. I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but $g_0$ is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra. (it has a compatible bracket on the dual the trivial one in the case of $g_0$). Translating this to $G_0$ makes $G_0$ a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions $F(G_0)$. Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H\in F(G_0)$ is enough to write the equations of motion on $G_0$. They are $df/dt = \{f,H\}$ With all this in place we can first remark the fact that our r-matrix is closely related to the bialgebra structure and CYBE to be a condition for integrability of the classical mechanical system. Next we may quantize with respect to the Poisson structure to obtain a deformation of the algebra of functions $F_h(G_0)$. We would then like to think of this non-commutative algebra as the algebra of functions on the (non-existent) quantum group. Integrability survives the quantization and is now expressed in terms of the R-matrix satisfying Yang-Baxter. Dually one may also consider universal enveloping algebra and its deformation as a Hopf algebra.

Quantizing often seems a little ad-hoc but Kontsevich gave a general procedure for (deformation) quantizing with respect to any Poisson structure. [1]

A reference for such things would be A guide to quantum groups by Chari and Pressley. Roland