Notes for AKT-170113/0:50:48

From Drorbn
Revision as of 09:18, 14 January 2017 by Rolandvdv (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Roland At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2 and working modulo h^3 . Notice I added the h^2 term to make the inverse R^{-1} be identical but with negative h, the factorial is just for fun. I wanted to test this idea in U(sl_2) where you can check that r_{ij} = E_iF_j + \frac{1}{4} H_iH_j is a solution to CYBE. If I got it right the positive Reidemeister 1 curl yields the value 1+ h(EF+\frac{1}{4}H^2)+\frac{1}{2}h^2(2E^2F^2 + EH^2F+EFH+\frac{H^4}{8}) bad news, we need the element S to get an invariant in this case. Taking \tilde{r}_{ij} = r_{ij}+r_{ji} we may do a little better in that now the curl yields 1+ h(EF+FE+\frac{1}{2}H^2)+\mathcal{O}(h^2) indicating our ambiguity may now be a central element (the Casimir at order h).