Notes for AKT-140314/0:02:29

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Boaz wrote:

I have one comment- you claim it is weaker than Galois. At least in one important aspect I think it is much stronger. I challenge you to show with Galois theory that if we add exp(z) to our list of allowed operations, a solution cannot be found...
In fact, I guess you can add to the list of allowed functions any continuous multivalued function with up to 4 values and it won't help (of course with 5 values you can solve it since the solution is such a function...). Am I right?

I believe Boaz is right, and he is making a very strong point - not only there is no formula for the roots of a quadratic in terms of radicals - in fact this remains true even if we are allowed to use other univalent functions (or even up to 4-valent).