Notes for AKT-140106/0:43:23: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "'''Claim:''' The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3. This is an expansion on the proof given by Przytycki (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/06081...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(Note by [[User:Cameron.martin]]):

'''Claim:''' The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3.
'''Claim:''' The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3.


Line 12: Line 14:


As a result, <math>xy^{-1} = (x_1y_1^{-1}, x_2y_2^{-1}, x_3y_3^{-1})</math> satisfies <math>x_1y_1^{-1}x_2y_2^{-1}x_3y_3^{-1} = (x_1x_2x_3)(y_3y_2y_1)^{-1} = 1</math> since both <math>x, y \in \mathcal{S}</math>. This implies that <math>xy^{-1} \in \mathcal{S}</math>, and hence shows that <math>\mathcal{S}</math> is a subgroup of <math>Z_3^n</math> for n = the number of line segments in the diagram. By Lagrange's theorem, the number of legal 3-colorings (the order of <math>\mathcal{S}</math>) is a power of 3.
As a result, <math>xy^{-1} = (x_1y_1^{-1}, x_2y_2^{-1}, x_3y_3^{-1})</math> satisfies <math>x_1y_1^{-1}x_2y_2^{-1}x_3y_3^{-1} = (x_1x_2x_3)(y_3y_2y_1)^{-1} = 1</math> since both <math>x, y \in \mathcal{S}</math>. This implies that <math>xy^{-1} \in \mathcal{S}</math>, and hence shows that <math>\mathcal{S}</math> is a subgroup of <math>Z_3^n</math> for n = the number of line segments in the diagram. By Lagrange's theorem, the number of legal 3-colorings (the order of <math>\mathcal{S}</math>) is a power of 3.


(Note by [[User:Leo algknt]]):

'''Using linear Algebra: Idea from class on Wednesday 23 May, 2018'''

Let <math>D</math> be a knot diagram for the knot <math>K</math> with <math>n</math> crossings. There are <math>n</math> arcs. Let <math>a_1, a_1, \ldots, a_n \in {\mathbb Z}_3</math> represent the arcs. Now let <math>a,b,c \in {\mathbb Z}_3</math>. Define <math>\wedge : {\mathbb Z}_3 \times {\mathbb Z}_3 \rightarrow {\mathbb Z}_3</math> by


<math>a\wedge b =

\left\{
\begin{array}{cc}
a, & a = b\\
c, & a\not= b
\end{array}
\right.</math>,
so that <math>a\wedge b + a + b \equiv 0\mod 3</math>.

Then, with the above definition, we get a linear equation <math>a_{i_1} + a_{i_2} + a_{i_3} \equiv 0\mod 3</math> for each each of the <math>n</math> crossings, where <math>i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}</math>. Thus we get a system of <math>n</math> linear equation, from which we get a matrix <math>M</math>. The nullspace <math>\mathrm{Null}(M)</math> of <math>M</math> is the solution to this system of equation and this is exactly the set of all 3-colourings of <math>D</math>. This is a vector space of size <math>\lambda(K) =|\mathrm{Null}(M)| = 3^{\dim(\mathrm{Null}(M))}</math>

Latest revision as of 14:36, 25 August 2018

(Note by User:Cameron.martin):

Claim: The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3.


This is an expansion on the proof given by Przytycki (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608172).


We'll show that the set of legal 3-colorings forms a subgroup of , for some r, which suffices to prove the claim. First, label each of the segments of the given diagram 1 through n, and denote a 3-coloring of this diagram by , where each is an element of the cyclic group of order 3 (each element representing a different colour). It is clear that is a subset of . To show it is a subgroup, we'll take , and show that . It suffices to restrict our attention to one crossing in the given diagram, so we can without loss of generality let n = 3.


First, we (sub)claim that a crossing (involving colours is legal if and only if in . Indeed, if the crossing is legal, either it is the trivial crossing in which case their product is clearly 1, or each is distinct, in which case . Conversely, suppose , and suppose . It suffices to show that . This follows by case checking: if , then ; if , then , implying that ; and if , then , implying that . Thus, the subclaim is proven.


As a result, satisfies since both . This implies that , and hence shows that is a subgroup of for n = the number of line segments in the diagram. By Lagrange's theorem, the number of legal 3-colorings (the order of ) is a power of 3.


(Note by User:Leo algknt):

Using linear Algebra: Idea from class on Wednesday 23 May, 2018

Let be a knot diagram for the knot with crossings. There are arcs. Let represent the arcs. Now let . Define by


, so that .

Then, with the above definition, we get a linear equation for each each of the crossings, where . Thus we get a system of linear equation, from which we get a matrix . The nullspace of is the solution to this system of equation and this is exactly the set of all 3-colourings of . This is a vector space of size