Notes for AKT-091001-1/0:45:32: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:38, 3 October 2009

The pretty way (through free associative algebra and commutators)

- i.e. the STU relation translates to the definition of $[,]$ and the IHX relation translates to the Jacobi identity.

Revision as of 02:34, 3 October 2009 (view source) Conan777 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary		Latest revision as of 02:38, 3 October 2009 (view source) Conan777 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ~~nicer~~ way ~~of proving~~ (through free associative algebra and commutators)		The pretty way (through free associative algebra and commutators)

			- i.e. the STU relation translates to the definition of <math>[ , ]</math> and the IHX relation translates to the Jacobi identity.