Knot at Lunch, June 28, 2007: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
==Some Content==
==Some Content==


'''Definition.''' The virtual braid group <math>VB_n</math> on <math>n</math> strands is the group generated by symbols <math>\sigma_{ij}</math> for <math>1\leq i\neq j\leq n</math> (standing for "strand <math>i</math> goes over strand <math>j</math>") modulo the relations
'''Definition.''' The virtual braid group <math>VB_n</math> on <math>n</math> strands is the group generated by symbols <math>\lambda_{ij}</math> for <math>1\leq i\neq j\leq n</math> (standing for "strand <math>i</math> goes over strand <math>j</math> from &lambda;eft to right" ) and <math>\rho_{ij}</math> (standing for "strand <math>i</math> goes over strand <math>j</math> from &rho;ight to left") modulo the relations
* <math>\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{ji}=1</math>,
* <math>\lambda_{ij}\rho_{ji}=1</math>,
* <math>\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{kl}=\sigma_{kl}\sigma_{ij}</math> (where <math>i,j,k,l</math> are distinct), and
* <math>\lambda_{ij}\lambda_{kl}=\lambda_{kl}\lambda_{ij}</math>, <math>\lambda_{ij}\rho_{kl}=\rho_{kl}\lambda_{ij}</math> and <math>\rho_{ij}\rho_{kl}=\rho_{kl}\rho_{ij}</math> (where <math>i,j,k,l</math> are distinct), and
* <math>\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{jk}\sigma_{ij}=\sigma_{jk}\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{jk}</math> (where <math>i,j,k</math> are distinct).
* <math>\lambda_{ij}\lambda_{jk}\lambda_{ij}=\lambda_{jk}\lambda_{ij}\lambda_{jk}</math> (and variants?) (where <math>i,j,k</math> are distinct).


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 10:39, 28 June 2007

In Preparation

The information below is preliminary and cannot be trusted! (v)

Invitation

Dear Knot at Lunch People,

We will have the fourth of our weekly summer lunches on Thursday June 28, 2007, at the usual place, Bahen 6180, at 12 noon, though this time it will be a short meeting - I'd like to attend a lecture at the Fields Institute at 1PM (titled "Proof of Banach-Tarski paradox") so we have to finish before that.

As always, please bring brown-bag lunch and fresh ideas. I have a few ideas for the agenda: a bit of propaganda about computing, and some words about an email I sent Dylan a few days ago (attached below). But of course, we may end up talking about something else.

As always, if you know anyone I should add to this mailing list or if you wish to be removed from this mailing list please let me know. To prevent junk accumulation in mailboxes, I will actively remove inactive people unless they request otherwise.

Best,

Dror.




Dylan,

In all things finite type (and elsewhere in knot theory) braids have always been one of the simplest examples.

So here's a bunch of *specific* questions:

What are virtual braids? Can they be combed? What are finite type invariants of virtual braids? Is there a structure-preserving universal finite type invariant of virtual braids? Does it separate virtual braids? Does every finite type invariant of braids extends to a finite type invariant of virtual braids, of the same degree? Do "Lie-bialgebraic" weight systems span all weight systems, for virtual braids? Can you write honest formulas in terms of arrow diagrams for an R-matrix?

Dror.

Some Content

Definition. The virtual braid group on strands is the group generated by symbols for (standing for "strand goes over strand from λeft to right" ) and (standing for "strand goes over strand from ρight to left") modulo the relations

  • ,
  • , and (where are distinct), and
  • (and variants?) (where are distinct).

References

The "computing" subject is around Some One Parameter Knot Theory Computations by Dror Bar-Natan and Thomas Fiedler. The defining work on virtual knots is Kauffman's Virtual Knot Theory, Europ. J. Combinatorics 20 (1999) 663–691. Other highly relevant papers are Goussarov-Polyak-Viro's Finite Type Invariants of Classical and Virtual Knots, arXiv:math/9810073 and Polyak's On the Algebra of Arrow Diagrams, Letters in Mathematical Physics 51-4 (2000) 275-291.