14-240/Tutorial-October14: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 288: Line 288:
:::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.
:::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.


::::Since <math>B_1 \subset W_1 \and B_2 \subset W_2</math>, then <math>(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.
::::Since <math>(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset (W_1 \cup W_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

::::Since <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math> is a subspace, then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>


:::We show that <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.
:::We show that <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.


::::Since <math>W_1 \subset span(B_1) \and W_2 \subset span(B_2)</math>, then <math>(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.
::::Since <math>B_1 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1) = W_1 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.

::::Since <math>B_2 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_2) = W_2 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.


::::Since <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math> is a subspace, then <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.
::::Then <math>(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.


:::Then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.
:::Then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

Revision as of 18:35, 20 October 2014

Boris

Elementary and (Not So Elementary) Errors in Homework

(1) Bad Notation


Let


be matrices. We want to equate to the set of all symmetric matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:


.


Firstly, is the set of all linear combinations of . To equate it to a single

symmetric matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements are undefined. What are they suppose to

represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues:


where is an arbitrary field.


(2) Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)

When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you

should show:

a) An algorithm for finding the solution
b) A proof that a solution is correct

If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this:


Determine if the vector is a linear combination of the vectors in .


Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side.

Problem 5h) in Homework 3 for all Fields

For an arbitrary field , determine if the matrix is in span .


Proof:

We show that .

We show that .
Assume that .
Let .
Then .
Then .
Since and the entries of the matrix are from , then .
Then .
Then .
We show that .
Assume to the contrary that .
Then .
Then this system of linear equations has a solution:
.
When solving this system, we see that it has no solution.
This contradicts the assumption that it has a solution.
Then .
Then . Q.E.D.


A Field Problem

Find the solution to in .

Note that a polynomial of degree has at most solutions.


Algorithm:

We find the solution to in .

Since in , then .
Since is additive inverse of , then .
By the result that we proved in Question 2 of Homework 1, then .
Then are the solutions.


A Dimension Problem

Let be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space over a field where . Then

.


Proof:

We show that .

Since is finite dimensional, then are finite dimensional.
Then we can let be a basis of and be a basis of .
We show that is a basis of .
We show that .
We show that .
Since , then .
We show that .
Since , then .
Since , then .
Then .
Then .
We show that is linearly independent.
Let where .
Then .
Since , then .
Since are linearly independent, then .
For , then .
Then is linearly independent.
Then is a basis of .
Since , then . Q.E.D.

Nikita