07-401/Class Notes for April 11: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{In Preparation}}
{{In Preparation}}


The goal of today's class is to prove (a weak but strong enough) form of the '''Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory''' as follows:
The goal of today's class is to prove a (weak but strong enough) form of the '''Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory''' as follows:


'''Theorem.''' Let <math>F</math> be a field of characteristic 0 and let <math>E</math> be a splitting field over <math>F</math>. Then there is a correspondence between the set <math>\{K:E/K/F\}</math> of intermediate field extensions <math>K</math> lying between <math>F</math> and <math>E</math> and the set <math>\{H:H<\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)\}</math> of subgroups <math>H</math> of the Galois group <math>\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)</math> of the original extension <math>E/F</math>:
'''Theorem.''' Let <math>F</math> be a field of characteristic 0 and let <math>E</math> be a splitting field over <math>F</math>. Then there is a correspondence between the set <math>\{K:E/K/F\}</math> of intermediate field extensions <math>K</math> lying between <math>F</math> and <math>E</math> and the set <math>\{H:H<\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)\}</math> of subgroups <math>H</math> of the Galois group <math>\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)</math> of the original extension <math>E/F</math>:

Revision as of 14:40, 4 April 2007

In Preparation

The information below is preliminary and cannot be trusted! (v)

The goal of today's class is to prove a (weak but strong enough) form of the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory as follows:

Theorem. Let be a field of characteristic 0 and let be a splitting field over . Then there is a correspondence between the set of intermediate field extensions lying between and and the set of subgroups of the Galois group of the original extension :

.

The bijection is given by mapping every intermediate extension to the subgroup of elements in that preserve ,

,

and reversely, by mapping every subgroup of to its fixed field :

.

Furthermore, this correspondence has the following further properties:

  1. It is inclusion-reversing: if then and if then .
  2. It is degree/index respecting: and .
  3. Splitting fields correspond to normal subgroups: If in is a splitting field then is normal in and .