06-1350/Some Equations by Kurlin

From Drorbn
Revision as of 18:16, 9 May 2007 by 133.11.55.34 (talk)
Jump to navigationJump to search

ambien online free qwest ringtones zanaflex online ativan online diethylpropion online cheap levitra cheap valium xanax online tramadol online viagra online phentermine online tracfone ringtones free ringtones phentermine online clonazepam sprint ringtones online xenical clonazepam online free tracfone ringtones cheap fioricet carisoprodol online but clonazepam xenical online cheap adipex buy tenuate but xanax diazepam online xanax online valium online ativan online hydrocodone online zyban online buy soma wwe ringtones ultram online meridia online free nokia ringtones cheap ambien cheap cyclobenzaprine tramadol online cheap ultram ambien online online phentermine sonyericsson ringtones buy valium free tracfone ringtones free motorola ringtones buy alprazolam free music ringtones levitra online alprazolam online real ringtones qwest ringtones buy carisoprodol midi ringtones clomid online free tracfone ringtones buy tramadol free ringtones online levitra but norco buy lorazepam diazepam online free free ringtones lorazepam online adipex online vicodin online viagra online buy phentermine paxil online cheap wellbutrin free free ringtones levitra online cheap ultram order tramadol cheap ativan cheap ultracet cheap meridia free free ringtones cheap paxil mtv ringtones diazepam online online didrex nokia ringtones free music ringtones mp3 ringtones mp3 ringtones samsung ringtones lipitor free sonyericsson ringtones cheap ativan cheap cialis cheap vicodin buy norco cialis online cheap levitra buy norco didrex online free funny ringtones cheap hydrocodone alprazolam online but hydrocodone nextel ringtones free funny ringtones cheap cialis sprint ringtones online ativan cheap ativan xanax online free sony ericsson ringtones viagra online cheap diazepam cheap fioricet funny ringtones didrex online free tracfone ringtones nokia ringtones cheap norco cheap carisoprodol free nokia ringtones ultram online free free ringtones cheap paxil free sagem ringtones paxil online propecia online buy ambien ultram online diazepam online order valium cheap viagra sony ringtones free motorola ringtones clonazepam online cheap diazepam pharmacy online mp3 ringtones cheap ultracet paxil online but diazepam viagra fioricet alprazolam cheap valium nexium online cheap lisinopril clonazepam online ericsson ringtones cheap soma nexium online cheap didrex celexa online free mp3 ringtones nexium buy carisoprodol cheap meridia ultracet online fioricet online cingular ringtones propecia online cheap soma funny ringtones alltel ringtones adipex free nokia ringtones zoloft online cheap sildenafil buy tramadol mono ringtones cyclobenzaprine online soma online cialis online cheap albuterol cialis funny ringtones cheap nexium free mp3 ringtones paxil online clonazepam online cheap ultracet buy soma free kyocera ringtones fioricet online free jazz ringtones but cyclobenzaprine free nokia ringtones buy propecia ativan online verizon ringtones cheap fioricet ambien online cheap xenical hoodia online tracfone ringtones order wellbutrin cheap cialis free nokia ringtones wellbutrin online meridia online levitra online

Claim [Kurlin]. The function defined by

Satisfies

The claim is, of course, very easily verifiable and if this class is successful, at some point in the future I will tell you why I care.

Typically long equations have no closed form solutions. Yet note that Kurlin first derived the equation and only then found its solution. Was he merely lucky that a solution existed, or was there some deeper principle guarding him from failure? I don't believe in luck and I prefer to believe in principles. Yet, at what level did the principle arise? Is it that all solvable equations of this kind have closed-form solutions, or was there an a priori reason why the math that Kurlin was doing lead him to an equation with a closed form solution?

Here are a few concrete questions to expose my ignorance of simple algebra. Note that is is a rational function in its variables and their exponentials. Let's call such functions "tame". The equation satisfies involves rational expressions in the variables and their exponentials and linear substitutions applied to . Let us call such equations "tame". (The equation is also linear in . You may or may not wish to include this in the definition of "tame"). So we see that this particular tame equation has a tame solution.

  • Is that always the case?
    • A pretty example is the tame equation , whose solution is the "first" transcendental function .
    • Are we done defining "new" special functions after we've defined or are there further ones that cannot be defined in terms of it?
    • If there are further ones, why haven't we heard about them? Or else, where do we read about them?
    • If there aren't further ones, this is a lovely "closure" property enjoyed by exponentials. How come I don't know it yet?
  • Assuming not all tame equations have tame solutions, what was special about our equation, that lead to the existence of a tame solution? Can you write a very general condition on tame equations that will ensure the existence of a tame solution? In other words, was Kurlin simply lucky that his equation had a tame solution (and clever that he found it!), or are there some general rules that guarded him against the wilderness?

[Kurlin] ^  Compressed Drinfel'd Associators, V. Kurlin, arXiv:math.GT/0408398.