06-1350/Class Notes for Tuesday November 7

From Drorbn
Revision as of 18:15, 6 November 2006 by Drorbn (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
In Preparation

The information below is preliminary and cannot be trusted! (v)

Today's handout was taken from Talks: HUJI-001116 (Knotted Trivalent Graphs, Tetrahedra and Associators).

The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Type Invariants

Almost Theorem. There exists a universal TG-morphism Z=(Z_\Gamma):KTG\to{\mathcal A} from the TG-algebra of knotted trivalent graphs to the TG-algebra of Jacobi diagrams. Furthermore, any two such TG-morphisms are twist equivalent.

Theorem. (Essentially due to Murakami and Ohtsuki, [MO]) There exists an R-normal TG-morphism Z=(Z_\Gamma):KTG\to{\mathcal A}^\nu from the TG-algebra of knotted trivalent graphs to the \nu-twisted TG-algebra of Jacobi diagrams. Furthermore, any two such TG-morphisms are twist equivalent.

The above theorem is simply the accurate formulation of the almost theorem above it. The "almost theorem" is just what you would have expected, with an additional uniqueness statement. The "theorem" just adds to it a few normalizations that actually make it right. The determination of these normalizations is quite a feat; even defining them takes a page or two. I'm not entirely sure why the Gods of mathematics couldn't have just allowed the "almost theorem" to be true and make our lives a bit simpler.

Enough whining; we just need to define "R-normal" and {\mathcal A}^\nu.

Definition. Z is called R-normal if Failed to parse (unknown function\MobiusSymbol): Z(\bigcirc)^{-1}Z(\MobiusSymbol)=\exp(\isolatedchord/4)

in {\mathcal A}(\bigcirc), where Failed to parse (unknown function\MobiusSymbol): (\MobiusSymbol)
denotes the positively-twisted Möbius band and where Failed to parse (unknown function\isolatedchord): (\isolatedchord)
denotes the unique degree 1 chord diagram in {\mathcal A}(\bigcirc).

Definition. {\mathcal A}^\nu is almost the same as {\mathcal A}. It has the same spaces (i.e., for any \Gamma, {\mathcal A}^\nu(\Gamma)={\mathcal A}(\Gamma)) and the same operations except the unzip operation. Let \nu denote the specific element of {\mathcal A}(\uparrow) defined in the following definition. If u_e denotes the unzip operation of an edge e for the TG-algebra {\mathcal A} and u^\nu_e is the corresponding operation in {\mathcal A}^\nu, the two operations are related by u^\nu_e=\nu^{1/2}_{e'}\nu^{1/2}_{e''}u_e\nu^{-1/2}_e. Here "\nu^{-1/2}_e" means "inject a copy of \nu^{-1/2} on the edge e of \Gamma, and likewise, "\nu^{1/2}_{e'}\nu^{1/2}_{e''}" means "inject copies of \nu^{1/2} on the edges e' and e'' of u_e\Gamma that are created by the unzip of e".

It remains to define \nu\in{\mathcal A}(\uparrow). Well, it is the element often called "the invariant of the unknot", for indeed, by a long chain of reasoning, it is the invariant of the unknot. It is also given by the following explicit formula of [BGRT] and [BLT]:

\nu=\chi\left(\exp_\cup\left(\sum_{n=1}^\infty b_{2n}\omega_{2n}\right)\right).

In the above formula \chi denotes the PBW "symmetrization" map, \exp_\cup means "exponentiation in the disjoint union sense", \omega_{2n} is the "wheel with 2n legs" (so Failed to parse (unknown function\twowheel): \omega_2=\twowheel,

Failed to parse (unknown function\fourwheel): \omega_4=\fourwheel,
etc.) and the b_{2n}'s are the "modified Bernoulli numbers" defined by the power series expansion
\sum_{n=0}^\infty b_{2n}x^{2n} = \frac12\log\frac{\sinh x/2}{x/2}

(so b_2=1/48, b_4=-1/5760, b_6=1/362880, etc.).

References

[BGRT] ^  D. Bar-Natan, S. Garoufalidis, L. Rozansky and D. P. Thurston, Wheels, wheeling, and the Kontsevich integral of the unknot, Israel Journal of Mathematics 119 (2000) 217-237, arXiv:q-alg/9703025.

[BLT] ^  D. Bar-Natan, T. Q. T. Le and D. P. Thurston, Two applications of elementary knot theory to Lie algebras and Vassiliev invariants, Geometry and Topology 7-1 (2003) 1-31, arXiv:math.QA/0204311.

[MO] ^  J. Murakami and T. Ohtsuki, Topological Quantum Field Theory for the Universal Quantum Invariant, Communications in Mathematical Physics 188 (1997) 501-520.