Notes for BBS/Severa-110126-095855.jpg

From Drorbn
Revision as of 10:36, 28 January 2011 by Drorbn (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

For the long term it would be a sin to accept the proof of Kontsevich's vanishing lemma as it is. A simple statement should have a simple transparent proof phrased within the same language. Also, this lemma is the obstruction to re-phrasing everything as a counting argument; understanding it may uncover an underlying counting argument.