\documentclass[11pt,notitlepage]{article}
\def\bare{n}
\usepackage[all]{xy}
\usepackage[english,greek]{babel}
\usepackage{dbnsymb, amsmath, graphicx, amssymb, datetime, multicol,
  stmaryrd, pifont, amscd, colortbl, mathtools, wasysym, needspace,
  import, longtable, overpic, enumitem, bbm, pdfpages, ../picins}
\usepackage{tensor}
\usepackage{txfonts}	% For \coloneqq; but harms \calA.
%\usepackage{mathtools}	% For \coloneqq.
%\usepackage{mathbbol}	% For \bbe; sometimes harmed by later packages.
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{xcolor}
\usepackage[textwidth=8.5in,textheight=11in,centering]{geometry}
\parindent 0in

% Following http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/847/22475:
\usepackage[setpagesize=false]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{colorlinks,
  linkcolor={blue!50!black},
  citecolor={blue!50!black},
  urlcolor={blue!50!black}
}

% Following http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/59340/how-to-highlight-an-entire-paragraph
\usepackage[framemethod=tikz]{mdframed}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\def\myurl{http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn}
\def\thistalk{Toronto-1912}
\def\title{Geography vs.\ Identity}

\def\navigator{{
  \href{\myurl}{Dror Bar-Natan}:
  \href{\myurl/Talks}{Talks}:
  \href{\myurl/Talks/\thistalk/}{\thistalk}:
}}
\def\thanks{{Thanks for inviting me to the {\em Topology} session!}}
\def\webdef{{{\greektext web}$\coloneqq$\href{http://drorbn.net/to19}{http://drorbn.net/to19/}}}
\def\web#1{{\href{\myurl/Talks/\thistalk/#1}{{\greektext web}/#1}}}
\def\titleA{{\bf\title}}
\def\titleB{{\title}}
\def\titleC{{\title}}

% Following http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/23521/tabular-vertical-alignment-to-top:
\def\imagetop#1{\vtop{\null\hbox{#1}}}

\definecolor{mgray}{HTML}{B0B0B0}
\definecolor{morange}{HTML}{FFA50A}
\def\blue{\color{blue}}
\def\gray{\color{gray}}
\def\mgray{\color{mgray}}
\def\morange{\color{morange}}
\def\red{\color{red}}
\def\yellowm#1{{\setlength{\fboxsep}{0pt}\colorbox{yellow}{$#1$}}}
\def\cbox#1#2{{\setlength{\fboxsep}{0pt}\colorbox{#1}{#2}}}

\def\arXiv#1{{\href{http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/#1}{arXiv:\linebreak[0]#1}}}

\def\act{{\hspace{-1pt}\sslash\hspace{-0.75pt}}}
\def\ad{\operatorname{ad}}
\def\Ad{\operatorname{Ad}}
\def\aft{$\overrightarrow{\text{4T}}$}
\def\AS{\mathit{AS}}
\def\bbZZ{{\mathbb Z\mathbb Z}}
\def\ced{{\linebreak[1]\null\hfill\text{$\bigcirc$}}}
\def\CW{\text{\it CW}}
\def\diag{\operatorname{diag}}
\def\FL{\text{\it FL}}
\def\Hom{\operatorname{Hom}}
\def\IHX{\mathit{IHX}}
\def\mor{\operatorname{mor}}
\def\PvB{{\mathit P\!v\!B}}
\def\PvT{{\mathit P\!v\!T}}
\def\qed{{\linebreak[1]\null\hfill\text{$\Box$}}}
\def\remove{\!\setminus\!}
\def\STU{\mathit{STU}}
\def\SW{\text{\it SW}}
\def\TC{\mathit{TC}}
\def\tr{\operatorname{tr}}
\def\vB{{\mathit v\!B}}
\def\vT{{\mathit v\!T}}

\def\barT{{\bar T}}
\def\bbe{\mathbbm{e}}
\def\bbD{{\mathbb D}}
\def\bbE{{\mathbb E}}
\def\bbO{{\mathbb O}}
\def\bbQ{{\mathbb Q}}
\def\bbR{{\mathbb R}}
\def\bbT{{\mathbb T}}
\def\bbZ{{\mathbb Z}}
\def\bcA{{\bar{\mathcal A}}}
\def\calA{{\mathcal A}}
\def\calD{{\mathcal D}}
\def\calF{{\mathcal F}}
\def\calG{{\mathcal G}}
\def\calI{{\mathcal I}}
\def\calK{{\mathcal K}}
\def\calO{{\mathcal O}}
\def\calP{{\mathcal P}}
\def\calR{{\mathcal R}}
\def\calS{{\mathcal S}}
\def\calT{{\mathcal T}}
\def\calU{{\mathcal U}}
\def\fraka{{\mathfrak a}}
\def\frakb{{\mathfrak b}}
\def\frakg{{\mathfrak g}}
\def\frakh{{\mathfrak h}}
\def\tilE{\tilde{E}}
\def\tilq{{\tilde{q}}}

\def\tDelta{\tensor[^t]{\Delta}{}}
\def\tf{\tensor[^t]{f}{}}
\def\tF{\tensor[^t]{F}{}}
\def\tg{\tensor[^t]{g}{}}
\def\tI{\tensor[^t]{I}{}}
\def\tm{\tensor[^t]{m}{}}
\def\tR{\tensor[^t]{R}{}}
\def\tsigma{\tensor[^t]{\sigma}{}}
\def\tS{\tensor[^t]{S}{}}
\def\tSW{\tensor[^t]{\SW}{}}

% From http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/154672/how-to-get-a-medium-sized-otimes
\DeclareMathOperator*{\midotimes}{\text{\raisebox{0.25ex}{\scalebox{0.8}{$\bigotimes$}}}}

%%%

\def\Abstract{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
{\red\bf Abstract.} Which is better, an emphasis on where things happen or on who are the participants? I can't
tell; there are advantages and disadvantages either way. Yet much of quantum topology seems to be heavily and
unfairly biased in favour of geography.
}}}}

\def\geog{{so {\red $x$} is $\gamma_2$.}}
\def\iden{{At {\red $x$} strand 1 crosses strand 3, so {\red $x$} is $\sigma_{13}$.}}

\def\Geographers{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\parshape 5 0in 2.7in 0in 2.7in 0in 2.7in 0in 2.7in 0in 3.95in
{\red\bf Geographers} care for placement; for them, braids and tangles
have ends at some distinguished points, hence they form categories whose
objects are the placements of these points. For them, the basic operation
is a binary ``stacking of tangles''. They are lead to monoidal categories,
braided monoidal categories, representation theory, and much or most of
we call ``quantum topology''.
}}}}

\def\Identiters{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\parshape 5 0in 2.1in 0in 2.1in 0in 2.1in 0in 2.1in 0in 3.95in
{\red\bf Identiters} believe that strand identity persists even if one crosses
or is being crossed. The key operation is a unary stitching operation $m^{ab}_c$,
and one is lead to study meta-monoids, meta-Hopf-algebras, etc. See \web{reg}, \web{kbh}.
}}}}

\def\Gold{{\raisebox{5mm}{\begin{minipage}[t]{3.95in}
\pichskip{0mm}\parpic[l]{
  \includegraphics[height=0.4in]{../Greece-1607/IASLogo.png}
} \picskip{2}
{\red\bf The Gold Standard} is set by the ``$\Gamma$-calculus'' Alexander formulas
(\web{mac}). An $S$-component tangle $T$ has $\Gamma(T) \in R_S\times
M_{S\times S}(R_S) = \left\{\begin{array}{c|c}\omega&S\\\hline
S&A\end{array}\right\}$ with $R_S\coloneqq\bbZ(\{T_a\colon a\in S\})$:

$\displaystyle
  \left(\tensor[_a]{\overcrossing}{_b},\tensor[_b]{\undercrossing}{_a}\right)
  \to
  \begin{array}{c|cc} 1 & a & b \\ \hline a & 1 & 1-T_a^{\pm 1} \\ b & 0 &
T_a^{\pm 1} \end{array}
$
\hfill$\displaystyle
  T_1\sqcup T_2
  \to
  \begin{array}{c|cc} \omega_1\omega_2 & S_1 & S_2 \\ \hline S_1 & A_1 & 0
\\ S_2 & 0 & A_2 \end{array}
$
\vskip -1mm
\[ \begin{CD}
  \begin{array}{c|ccc}
    \omega & a & b & S \\
    \hline
    a & \alpha & \beta & \theta \\
    b & \gamma & \delta & \epsilon \\
    S & \phi & \psi & \Xi
  \end{array}
  @>{\displaystyle m^{ab}_c}>{\displaystyle T_a,T_b\to T_c}>
  \left(\!\begin{array}{c|cc}
    (1-\beta)\omega & c & S \\
    \hline
    c & \gamma+\frac{\alpha\delta}{1-\beta} & \epsilon+\frac{\delta\theta}{1-\beta} \\
    S & \phi+\frac{\alpha\psi}{1-\beta} & \Xi+\frac{\psi\theta}{1-\beta}
  \end{array}\!\right)
\end{CD} \]
\end{minipage}}}}

\def\Braids{{\raisebox{0mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\def\neg{\hspace{-1.5mm}}
Geography:\hfill\text{(better topology!)}
\[
  GB\coloneqq\langle\gamma_i\rangle\left/\left(\neg\begin{array}{c}
    \gamma_i\gamma_k=\gamma_k\gamma_i \text{ when }|i-k|>1 \\
    \gamma_i\gamma_{i+1}\gamma_i=\gamma_{i+1}\gamma_i\gamma_{i+1}
  \end{array}\neg\right)\right. = B.
\]

Identity:\hfill\text{(captures quantum algebra!)}
\[
  IB\coloneqq\langle\sigma_{ij}\rangle\left/\left(\neg\begin{array}{c}
    \sigma_{ij}\sigma_{kl}=\sigma_{kl}\sigma_{ij} \text{ when }|\{i,j,k,l\}|=4 \\
    \sigma_{ij}\sigma_{ik}\sigma_{jk}=\sigma_{jk}\sigma_{ik}\sigma_{ij} \text{ when }|\{i,j,k\}|=3
  \end{array}\neg\right)\right. = \PvB.
\]

{\red Theorem.} Let $S=\{\tau\}$ be the symmetric group. Then $\vB$ is both
\[
  \PvB\rtimes S \cong B\ast S\left/\left(
    \gamma_i\tau=\tau\gamma_j \text{ when }\tau i=j,\,\tau(i+1)=(j+1)
  \right)\right.
\]
(and so $\PvB$ is ``bigger'' then $B$, and hence quantum algebra doesn't see topology very well).

{\red Proof.} Going left, $\gamma_i\mapsto\sigma_{i,i+1}(i\ i+1)$. Going right, if $i<j$ map
$\sigma_{ij}\mapsto(j\!-\!1\ j\!-\!2\ \ldots\ i)\gamma_{j-1}(i\ i\!+\!1\ \ldots\ j)$ and if $i>j$ use
$\sigma_{ij}\mapsto(j\ j\!+\!1\ \ldots\ i)\gamma_j(i\ i\!-\!1\ \ldots\ j\!+\!1)$.
}}}}

\def\dts{{$\!\cdots$}}

\def\Burau{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\parshape 4 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.95in
{\red\bf The Burau Representation} of $\PvB_n$ acts on
$R^n\coloneqq\bbZ[t^{\pm 1}]^n = R\langle v_1,\ldots,v_n\rangle$ by
\[ \sigma_{ij}v_k=v_k+\delta_{kj}(t-1)(v_j-v_i). \]

\newcount\snip
\snip=0\loop
  \advance \snip 1
  \par\needspace{0mm}\includegraphics[scale=\cellscale]{Snips/GvIExamples/P-\the\snip.pdf}
\ifnum \snip<1 \repeat

\newcount\snip
\snip=0\loop
  \advance \snip 1
  \par\needspace{0mm}\includegraphics[scale=\cellscale]{Snips/GvIExamples/B-\the\snip.pdf}
\ifnum \snip<7 \repeat

\parshape 1 0in 2.95in
$S_n$ acts on $R^n$ by permuting the $v_i$ so the Burau representation extends to $\vB_n$
and restricts to $B_n$. With this, $\gamma_i$ maps $v_i\mapsto v_{i+1}$,
$v_{i+1}\mapsto tv_i\!+\!(1\!-\!t)v_{i+1}$, and otherwise $v_k\mapsto
v_k$.
}}}}

\def\Gassner{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\parshape 4 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.95in
{\red\bf The Gassner Representation} of $\PvB_n$ acts on
$V=R^n\coloneqq\bbZ[t_1^{\pm 1},\ldots,t_n^{\pm 1}]^n = R\langle v_1,\ldots,v_n\rangle$ by
\[ \sigma_{ij}v_k=v_k+\delta_{kj}(t_i-1)(v_j-v_i). \]
\newcount\snip
\snip=0\loop
  \advance \snip 1
  \par\needspace{0mm}\includegraphics[scale=\cellscale]{Snips/GvIExamples/G-\the\snip.pdf}
\ifnum \snip<3 \repeat

$S_n$ acts on $R^n$ by permuting the $v_i$ {\em and} the $t_i$, so the Gassner representation extends to
$\vB_n$ and then restricts to $B_n$ as a $\bbZ$-linear $\infty$-dimensional representation. It then descends to
${\mathit P\!B}_n$ as a finite-rank $R$-linear representation, with lengthy non-local formulas.

{\red Geographers:} Gassner is an obscure partial extension of Burau.

{\red Identiters:} Burau is a trivial silly reduction of Gassner.
}}}}

\def\TurboGassner{{\raisebox{2mm}{\parbox[t]{3.95in}{
\parshape 4 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.35in 0in 3.95in
{\red\bf The Turbo-Gassner Representation.} With the same $R$ and $V$, $TG$ acts on $V\oplus(R^n\otimes V)\oplus
(\calS^2V\otimes V^\ast) = R\langle v_k, v_{lk}, u_iu_jw_k \rangle$ by
\newcount\snip
\snip=0\loop
  \advance \snip 1
  \par\needspace{0mm}\includegraphics[scale=\cellscale]{Snips/GvIExamples/TG-\the\snip.pdf}
\ifnum \snip<3 \repeat

\vskip -5.5mm
\parshape 1 0.75in 2.95in
Like Gassner, $TG$ is also a representation of ${\mathit P\!B}_n$. {\red I have no idea where it belongs!}
}}}}

\def\cellscale{0.645}

\begin{document} \latintext
%\setlength{\jot}{0ex}
\setlength{\abovedisplayskip}{0.5ex}
\setlength{\belowdisplayskip}{0.5ex}
\setlength{\abovedisplayshortskip}{0ex}
\setlength{\belowdisplayshortskip}{0ex}
\begin{center}\null\vfill\scalebox{0.98}{\input{GvI1.pdftex_t}}\vfill\null\end{center}

\end{document}

\endinput

