\section*{To Do}

\begin{itemize}

\item Add some moral explanations near the Lie-theoretic definitions of
$C$, $RC$, $J$, $j$, $\Gamma$, and $\Lambda$.

\end{itemize}

{\bf Comments by Zsuzsi.}

The word ``certain'' is used too many times in the abstract. I think it
would sell better to be more specific there, even at the cost of a longer
abstract.

Similarly, I think you could make the first paragraph of the introduction
sound less enigmatic.

In the first topology paragraph on page 5, you could say ``for S, T, H some
sets'', or something along those lines to make it less cryptic?

In general I think the introduction and abstract should cater more to
readers not initiated, I think in general if someone doesn't understand
the introduction to a paper they are much less likely to bother reading
the rest. (Ps: I do love Figure 1.)

Occasionally I think it might make sense to group the math on one or two
full pages and then the corresponding computation on one or two full
pages.

{\bf {\tt FreeLie.m} to do.}
\FLQuote{ToDo}