\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{inputenc,fullpage,amsmath,amssymb}

%opening
\title{List of edits for ``Finite type invariants of w-knotted objects II: tangles, foams and the Kashiwara-Vergne problem''}
\author{Dror Bar-Natan and Zsuzsanna Dancso}

\begin{document}

\maketitle

We would like to thank the referee for pointing out several ways to improve the clarity of the paper. We made changes
to implement these suggestions, below is the list of changes corresponding to the referee's numbered comments.

\begin{enumerate}
\item We have changed the notation ``proj'' to ``grad'' and no longer use the terminology ``projectivization''. For lack of a better name we
call ``$\operatorname{grad}\mathcal{O}$'' the ``associated graded structure'' in the text, and explain at the beginning that we always take 
the associated graded with respect to a very
specific filtration which remains the same throughout the different constructions.
\item Indeed; we added a footnote to explain.
\item We added Example 3.2 and Figure 3 (both on Page 12) to address this, and Remark 3.8 on Page~14 to explain the relationships between the expansions 
and associated graded structures.
\item We added a comment and a reference at the end of Definition 3.5 (which used to be Definition~3.4), still on Page~13.
\item Elements of $vT$ and $wT$ do have skeleta, we hope to have clarified this point in Example~3.2 and Figure~3 on Page~12.
Upon reading your comment we noticed that we had neglected to mention skeleta for $wTF$ though. We rectified this in Section~4 by adding a note
to Definition~4.1 (Page~29), and also by clarifying the definition of the associated graded structure at the beginning of Section~4.2 (Page~34).
\item Indeed.


\end{enumerate}


\end{document}